Commentary
Frog or Prince?
 

Don’t feel left out if your candidate did not win in Election 2000; you are in the majority. Now you are urged to join with others supporting Mr. Bush and his administration. Many voters will, but obviously not the Democrats in Washington, busy sharpening their knives and testing the swing of their bats.

Gridlock between armed political camps is almost perfect, providing Congress the excuse it wants to neglect the serious hot-button problems in healthcare, transportation, education, fiscal and monetary policy. The probable outcome? Equal numbers of pork barrel projects and payoffs.

We must redirect their attention!

New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd’s entertaining Jan. 3 column on the coming reign of George II contained elements of truth. I wonder if she knows George Bush is related to the Royals of Great Britain, all the way back to George III of 1776 fame. Bloodlines not withstanding, his selection resembled a coronation by the Legal Lords of our Land.

The most urgent duty of the chosen one is to reward his supporters at government expense. Some pay-off projects actually benefit the people. Others are boondoggles, like the S&L debacle, where money evaporated out the backside, as theorized for black holes.

Most elections are frog-kissing contests. As usual, we got a frog. His royal bloodlines are too thin to produce a prince without a lot of effort. As good Americans we must do our duty and help him.

The only way to Princehood for President Bush is endorsing NESARA.

We can help by promoting NESARA. It will be interesting to note those Senators and Congressmen supporting NESARA and those opposing it. I will be amused watching the opponents denigrate something that helps everyone in the U.S. and eventually the world. Does Congress want to help the people or rule them? Does George Bush want to be a crowned prince or an admired one? Time will tell.

Esther